Comments for MACC Competitions Website

Comment on Travel by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:51:33 +0000

TR6 2ND PLACE
The low viewpoint has worked well and detail well held.

Comment on Travel by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:51:11 +0000

TR5 3RD PLACE
Good depth to the image, but left side lacks interest.
Perhaps a vertical crop and a figure in the background may have helped

Comment on Travel by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:50:37 +0000

TR4 1ST PLACE
Atmospheric and beautiful. Subtle detail retained throughout

Comment on Travel by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:50:15 +0000

TR3 4TH PLACE
Vignetting (burning in of sky) distracts from the image. If chin had had a little separation from building, or appeared to be completely supported by it, that may have helped.

Comment on Travel by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:49:46 +0000

TR2 5TH PLACE
Differential focus and slow shutter speed used well, but sky would benefit from more interest. Landscape photography is all about light.

Comment on Travel by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:49:00 +0000

TR1 6TH PLACE
Foreground sweep of the river “supports” the image. Detail held well in the sky
Needed to be shot in more interesting lighting conditions

Comment on Still Life by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:46:13 +0000

SL6 6TH PLACE
Disappointing quality with pixellation very evident.

Comment on Still Life by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:45:54 +0000

SL5 4TH PLACE
Some loss of differentiation between background and subject.
May work better in monochrome

Comment on Still Life by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:45:36 +0000

SL4 1ST PLACE
Some nice detail in the highlights (cracking glaze, evidence of careful choice of cropping).Overall a good graphic image.

Comment on Still Life by Judge

Judge — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:45:17 +0000

SL3 3RD PLACE
Nicely held highlights and detail.
However, the cropping could be more inventive